From dev-return-24638-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Fri Mar 02 06:05:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 47558 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2007 06:05:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2007 06:05:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 40563 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2007 06:05:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 40526 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2007 06:05:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 40517 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2007 06:05:11 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:05:11 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of pavel.ozhdikhin@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.224] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:04:59 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 58so1034376wri for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:04:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mFGUVv18dxBJOC17Qfwsky9ehUpw1XY3XX6uMEmxJC4yPxrHteTBx89njy+0XAoouzD6Jm9g5JDpUqbszyPgoSg3QuuZp81tfM+tc8abIZO6D9WhTwtMf2/6JLKhd2Vjwn3rPf+1ak34tEEa+8kygQNBjtZiCJr/hVNVhbyW1zg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=I8jZDdTMeqxUJBob9vl3LGEWGCJ2IN5CxHN2rctkHlszcuv9wdX4gddqfmF0tMcWfKXOgR7KJHTVPjK6Xkw138hHV9J2oMqkKgAC9+dIABBROqUkXU6P0ZS1UWbGAuAXjV4VtPkzGmpyiGz6W09D51hh/Dnl1RnVnKF1a0dlzCY= Received: by 10.115.33.1 with SMTP id l1mr113314waj.1172815478590; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.194.17 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:04:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <469bff730703012204v2dc29b6cpbc3307cc3881acfd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 12:04:38 +0600 From: "Pavel Ozhdikhin" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][tesing]run modes for DRLVM tests In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_76955_5064711.1172815478543" References: <7273946b0703010534s26631bcfq66272481bc82167@mail.gmail.com> <0vqejo9rm4o.fsf@gmail.com> <7273946b0703011858o2711d429pee9d50d32bf60649@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_76955_5064711.1172815478543 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline We have to make sure the default mode is 100% stable. It's just strange that we did not test it in pre-commit checks till now. BTW in the default mode all methods first compiled by JET so testing default mode may be considered as testing JET + recompilation mechanics. I vote for changing JET to default in pre-commit tests. To ensure coverage of other modes (JET, server) we may add them to the CC testing. We should keep balance between the coverage of different modes by pre-commit tests and the time needed to run them. Thanks, Pavel On 3/2/07, Alexey Varlamov wrote: > > 2007/3/2, Vladimir Ivanov : > > On 01 Mar 2007 18:58:47 +0300, Egor Pasko wrote: > > > On the 0x28C day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Ivanov wrote: > > > > Hello everybody, > > > > I think that we also should run DRLVM tests in the default (without > > > > any switches) mode. > > > > > > why? has there been any test that failed in default mode while passing > > > in jet, opt, server modes? > > OTOH the jet mode did not detect regressions for a long, either. The > question of default settings is usually a subtle matter, but indeed > testing of default mode by default seems reasonable ;) > > > > > Seems we should check the default behavior of VM. And yes, this mode > > has some specific bugs, for example, Harmony-2692. > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > Issue 3276 was created to track it. Note, this > > > > issue also update default test run modes from "int, jet, opt" to > "int, > > > > def, opt". > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Egor Pasko > > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_76955_5064711.1172815478543--