harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][testing] what is default behavior for intermittently failed tests exclude lists?
Date Thu, 15 Mar 2007 11:38:32 GMT
yes, but not by CC, and also, if we can find a way to tag them in the  
output so when we see a failure, and it's tagged as "intermittent",  
the developer knows to run it again rather than go hunting.

I really do think that we'd be well served by fixing the intermittent  
tests - they point at something broken that we just don't understand,  
and that gives me the heebie-jeebies.  I don't mind things that are  
known to be broken, if we understand why, but mysteries?  no thanks :)


On Mar 12, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:

> +1 for running intermittently failed tests by default
> 2007/3/12, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com>:
>> Hello everyone,
>> I want to discuss issue 3352 while it changes the current behavior of
>> excluding policy for intermittently failed tests. I suggest running
>> intermittently failed test by default. So the resulting exclude list
>> by default will be combined as common + platform instead of common +
>> platform + intermittent.
>> Is it OK?
>>  thanks, Vladimir

View raw message