harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2007 14:36:21 GMT

On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote:

> 2007/3/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
>>
>> I think that each release should be well tested and documented.  We
>> should do the release train, with each release getting better and
>> better - no regressions unless we all agree there's a darn good
>> reason for it.
>
> What would be the interval between the releases in the "train"?
> If it's 3 months then yes we can have such a train. If it's a week  
> then
> we all will be busy with releases and won' have time for coding

Monthly?  I think we can play it by ear - move forward, and adjust as  
we learn things.  Also, we need to work it out so things don't grind  
to a halt at release time.

I'll start a second thread to discuss this approach.

geir


Mime
View raw message