harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ivaschenko, Aleksei V" <aleksei.v.ivasche...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [testing] Contribution of the automated scenario for Jetty
Date Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:31:45 GMT

Sorry for loud word 'contribution' and occurred misunderstanding :)
Really this is just a unit test (not very large) with several testcases
and scripts which allow running the test by means of proposed by
Alexander new BT framework.

I suppose the test could be integrated without voting, but we should
remember that it depends on other contribution (new BT).


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:mloenko@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 6:11 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [testing] Contribution of the automated scenario for Jetty
>Hi Aleksei
>thanks for your contribution!
>My question here is that is it a bulk contribution (and thus requires
>or this is something like for example a new not very large test
>an individual and thus can probably be integrated without voting?
>2007/3/30, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <aleksei.v.ivaschenko@intel.com>:
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to announce my contribution of automated scenario for Jetty
>> application server:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3530
>> The Jetty scenario was created in order to test if Harmony JRE is
>> to run Jetty server and it works just fine. This scenario is far from
>> covering the whole Jetty functionality, for now it just tests some
>> things such as:
>>  o Server successfully starts and stops using given JRE
>>  o Server successfully deploys its test web applications
>>  o Some of the test applications works properly, i.e. user addresses
>>   site links and receives valid responses (pages)
>> The scenario contains 5 testcases which test the following:
>>  o Initial(home) page of the site hosted by Jetty
>>  o Page with static content of large size
>>  o Servlet-based pages
>>  o JSP-based page
>>  o Page with static content archived with GZip
>> The scenario is automated using improved Build Test framework
>> (HARMONY-3501). The following modes are supported by means of new BT
>> features:
>>  o Run of the scenario on just built classlib and drlvm
>>  o Run of the scenario in standalone mode (once)
>>  o Run of the scenario in continuous mode using Cruise Control tool
>> Recent runs of my scenario finds the bug in Harmony runtime. I didn't
>> investigate it yet, but I'll do it soon and file according issue.
>> Thanks,
>> Aleksei.

View raw message