harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Naveen Neelakantam <neela...@uiuc.edu>
Subject Re: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements
Date Tue, 06 Mar 2007 06:16:38 GMT
+1

On Mar 6, 2007, at 12:08 AM, Kalpak Gadre wrote:

> +1
>> I don't see a big issue here to ague about - my impression is that  
>> most of
>> the issues currently we have are OS-independent. Why not focus on
>> architecture rather then OS? We've already implementation for  
>> Windows/Linux.
>> I've heard that Windows implementation a bit more optimized (VM  
>> guys please
>> correct me if I'm wrong). But is it really doesn't matter, IMHO,  
>> they both
>> are quite solid. And I think that improving both of them won't double
>> required efforts (compared to improving implementation for one  
>> selected OS).
>>
>>
>> Let's say that x86 (Windows/Linux) is our primary focus. And next  
>> goal is to
>> be solid on x86-64 architecture.
>


Mime
View raw message