On Mar 25, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based implementation, or
> enhance it?
>
> To enhance, of course. Why replace a good thing?
:)
>
> Vasily
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:25 AM
> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors
>
>
> On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:
>
>> Hi, all!
>>
>> I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
>> optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
>> Corporation.
>>
>> They could be found at:
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
>>
>> I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this
>> contribution
>> for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation
>> for
>> Harmony.
>
> I don't understand. Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based
> implementation, or enhance it?
>
>>
>> I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Vasily Zakharov
>> Intel ESSD
|