harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "tatyana doubtsova" <tatyanadoubts...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general][testing] run of classlib tests on overloaded box
Date Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:10:01 GMT
Hi,

I also see such reports on lnx ia64:
........
    [junit] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.597 sec
    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.32 sec
    [junit] free(): invalid pointer 0x2aab99d7e0!
    [junit] SIGSEGV in VM code.
    [junit] Stack trace:
    [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.138 sec
    [junit] Tests run: 10, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.034 sec
........

But the tests report PASS in the same time.

Thanks,
Tanya


On 3/20/07, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> in order to look at CC failure notification (issue 3437) the CLASSLIB
> tests were run in the 'stress' environment. Seems, we have a big
> problem here. On the 'awt' module I already saw some output like:
> <...>
>    [junit] free(): invalid pointer 0x1e1f0e0!
>    [junit] free(): invalid pointer 0x1e19560!
>    [junit] free(): invalid pointer 0x1e3af10!
>    [junit] Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 1.074 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.075 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.011 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.032 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.109 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.009 sec
>    [junit] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.05 sec
>    [junit] SIGSEGV in VM code.
>    [junit] Stack trace:
>    [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Time elapsed: 0 sec
>    [junit] Tests FAILED (timeout)
> <...>
>
> Also some tests in other modules failed.
> If someone wants to investigate tests behavior in this environment
> I'll share results of my run when it finished.
>
> Thanks, Vladimir
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message