harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Morozova, Nadezhda" <nadezhda.moroz...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements
Date Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:40:27 GMT
Hi all,
For everyone's convenience and not to lose any ideas, I've tried to sum
up this thread on a wiki page.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 5:36 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [general] Harmony Q2 release requirements
>On Mar 6, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> 2007/3/6, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
>>> I think that each release should be well tested and documented.  We
>>> should do the release train, with each release getting better and
>>> better - no regressions unless we all agree there's a darn good
>>> reason for it.
>> What would be the interval between the releases in the "train"?
>> If it's 3 months then yes we can have such a train. If it's a week
>> then
>> we all will be busy with releases and won' have time for coding
>Monthly?  I think we can play it by ear - move forward, and adjust as
>we learn things.  Also, we need to work it out so things don't grind
>to a halt at release time.
>I'll start a second thread to discuss this approach.

View raw message