harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Zakharov, Vasily M" <vasily.m.zakha...@intel.com>
Subject RE: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors
Date Sun, 25 Mar 2007 18:30:42 GMT

> Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based implementation, or
enhance it?

To enhance, of course. Why replace a good thing?

 Vasily


-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com] 
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 12:25 AM
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: Contribution of JMX and JMX remote connectors


On Mar 22, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Zakharov, Vasily M wrote:

> Hi, all!
>
> I'd like to announce the contribution of JMX implementation and JMX
> optional remote connectors implementation on behalf of Intel
> Corporation.
>
> They could be found at:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3473 (JMX)
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-3474 (connectors).
>
> I think it would be helpful to use some solutions of this contribution
> for improving MX4J and creating state-of-the-art JMX implementation  
> for
> Harmony.

I don't understand.  Is this meant to replace our current MX4J based  
implementation, or enhance it?

>
> I welcome you to try the contribution and share your opinions.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vasily Zakharov
> Intel ESSD

Mime
View raw message