Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23294 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2007 16:27:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Feb 2007 16:27:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 86308 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2007 16:27:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86121 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2007 16:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86112 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2007 16:27:28 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:28 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gcjhd-harmony-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 08:27:16 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HJBLj-0004GD-Eh for dev@harmony.apache.org; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:26:47 +0100 Received: from msfwpr01.ims.intel.com ([62.118.80.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:26:47 +0100 Received: from gshimansky by msfwpr01.ims.intel.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:26:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@harmony.apache.org From: Gregory Shimansky Subject: Re: [general] Harmony enabling at Windows / x86_64 Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:26:29 +0300 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: msfwpr01.ims.intel.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ivan Zvolsky wrote: > I have also put my efforts with drlvm building to HARMONY-3196. The patch > makes drlvm buildable on windows/em64t (and shouldn't break building on > other platforms). > > It still has some things to do, which I described in subtasks for > HARMONY-3196. I looked at the patches and I have a question. You've added amd64 architecture in some select statements in the build along with em64t flag. I thought that from the build point they are equivalent, and build.arch property is defined in build.xml for all kinds of arch (x86_64, em64t, amd64) to be equal to "em64t". Why add another flag in build files? > On 2/16/07, Ivan Zvolsky wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Some time ago, I found out that Harmony is not buildable on Windows / >> x86_64 (EM64T). >> I tried to reanimate at least the build which has required to update both >> classlib and drlvm build files, create stubs for some functions, etc. >> >> I've put my results (for now only classlib part) to HARMONY-3188. >> Could someone take a look? The comments are welcome. >> >> In particular, Geir might want to look at the first comment in the >> description :) >> >> Thanks, >> Ivan >> >> >> > -- Gregory