Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of richard.liangyx@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=gA31qREt7PwpuxXwZS4z4Z7TG+nTxZ/46BYdEE0wGnY+Nm6Tl/s5ZoC4wMZGDxaQeKksMjX0BSD0EpSQ4j+1yI/rbMRtuewy6kZRDgoz84Nb4NVOB70fMn91/0Liaqf++wzDsIohdITpU5dela7bnu8Y802ifYuUtSmQAanQwvw=
Message-ID: <ea7a13d60702050012m142138b1g37cca9b7ba206f84@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 16:12:58 +0800
From: "Richard Liang" <richard.liangyx@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][test]Test Coverage
In-Reply-To: <7273946b0702042017x5cd27812n8a0c955ad7b0da9c@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <f982cec50701292006g68464fe9t2d0753b8dbec4ba4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f982cec50702041830w28701610hcfd31eae1680e04b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ea7a13d60702041904i3d7c6770kcbcdd55ea175870e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7273946b0702042017x5cd27812n8a0c955ad7b0da9c@mail.gmail.com>

Great ;-)

On 2/5/07, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Richard Liang <richard.liangyx@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello Paulex,
> >
> > On 2/5/07, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Seems this mail didn't reach the mailing list, resend it...please ignore if
> > > you have got it.
> > >
> > > And if no other volunteers, I'd like to update the detail information on my
> > > apache home.
> >
> > I'd like to take a try. ;-)  But could you please say more about the
> > "cannot be instrumented classes"? And I have no idea about the legal
> > issues.  (Should be OK to run GNU Classpath's tests.)
>
> Actually, it depends on instrumentation tool. Usually, tool can
> instrument classes on which it depends on just because cyclic
> dependency on initialization.
>
>  Thanks, Vladimir
>
> PS. seems, my site didn't work anymore. I'm going to migrate on harmonytest.org.
>
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Richard
> >
> >
> > >
> > > 2007/1/30, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > I noticed that the test coverage data wiki[1] hasn't been updated since
> > > > Oct. 2, and the detailed information page[2] has disappeared for some time,
> > > > any volunteer to recover and maintain this information?
> > > >
> > > > Further, I'm thinking about the classes cannot be instrumented by
> > > > Emma(say, j.u.Properties, j.l.Class, etc), I'd like try to find some way
> > > > to generate coverage data for them.
> > > >
> > > > I think it is time for classlib guys to pay more attention on the code
> > > > quality/performance, etc, improve the test coverage rate may be a good
> > > > start. Currently, seems the average method coverage is less than 60%, i.e.,
> > > > almost 40% methods are not tested at all, I cannot sleep everytime I think
> > > > about this;-). And as a rough comparison, GNU Classpath has 50K test
> > > > cases[3], while Harmony only has 20K. (But, possible for us to run GNU
> > > > Classpath's Mauve test cases on Harmony? any legal and technical issues?)
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information
> > > > [2] http://viv.byethost15.com/
> > > > [3] http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve/report/
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Paulex Yang
> > > > China Software Development Labotary
> > > > IBM
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Paulex Yang
> > > China Software Development Labotary
> > > IBM
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Liang
> > China Development Lab, IBM
> >
>


-- 
Richard Liang
China Development Lab, IBM