Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69514 invoked from network); 9 Feb 2007 09:51:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Feb 2007 09:51:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 55433 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 09:51:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 55402 invoked by uid 500); 9 Feb 2007 09:51:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 55393 invoked by uid 99); 9 Feb 2007 09:51:20 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:51:20 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.3 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of liyilei1979@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.236] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:51:11 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i21so747226wra for ; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:50:50 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=S+evGo3+qG9goG+yZaB7ezOxwYJpfr60gX3VKMiwD/W/etuXimL1CHc1+WuB6l/vKFGdzFJ/ocrh0s/JoHxU+1kOLM3uUK9vkqxJWxWb/GAV6f8dA1IQx04LqEoGzSvvYp1uATarkoBTtKswLTca+3wlTzi78VqotCdU4Wz2t7Y= Received: by 10.90.102.20 with SMTP id z20mr12149529agb.1171014650260; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:50:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.28.2 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Feb 2007 01:50:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:50:50 +0800 From: "Leo Li" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib]Recommend to use a newer version of mx4j. In-Reply-To: <200702090727.l197ReTI010042@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_43179_32236480.1171014650229" References: <200702090727.l197ReTI010042@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_43179_32236480.1171014650229 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi, Mark: Thank you for pointing out that. I am still curious why the release of new version is not mentioned on mx4j's homepage.:) I will make a patch to fix it. On 2/9/07, Mark Hindess wrote: > > > See: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1901 > > I'd still like to know why the new release is not mentioned on the > home page and is not on ibiblio. But if someone is going to write the > (non-trivial because you can't just grab the jar from ibiblio) patch to > change to use 3.0.2 then I'd probably apply it. > > -Mark. > > On 9 February 2007 at 14:09, "Leo Li" wrote: > > > > Hi, all: > > I am just trying to run jboss tests on Harmony. But one problem is > that > > there seems to be a bug in mx4j-3.0.1 we currently used. I have reported > it > > as HARMONY-3147. > > However, it is ok with the mx4j-3.0.2. And I have tried it on my > > machine and it can pass Harmony tests. > > So I recommend to replace the one with the latest version. > > If no one objects, I will give a patch to fix it. > > > > Good luck! > > -- > > Leo Li > > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > ------=_Part_41476_20162926.1171001344675-- > > > > > -- Leo Li China Software Development Lab, IBM ------=_Part_43179_32236480.1171014650229--