Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=LslYAmiAtFSQvX9y+OYZIFCVtMnvQ+ndf/tZ9oL4trzEmEEHznP6++Qwc8jQnO2AUrWvpSwv+HzCtSEi6AEJVAGrcj0/F0uAFC67VvbGomp8BRxlJrdjR2dw24pEY6Z1WOhcCMCKsP0m/w28sxpAJgTxB0aB5PIh8/5FWyihZpM=
Message-ID: <c3755b3a0702060102se73bb78w884a4add4f74d8b3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:02:00 +0300
From: "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira][general] Good issue resolution guideline update
In-Reply-To: <636fd28e0702060028w797cb2fas59b8e7c945e83fcb@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <c3755b3a0702050810i18467b5fv67d055eba07b04d9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f982cec50702052143q1bea28bkca96bc92fd11d1f4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <636fd28e0702060028w797cb2fas59b8e7c945e83fcb@mail.gmail.com>

2007/2/6, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>:
> On 06/02/07, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I also had some thoughts to keep the patch history, recently I reviewed and
> > commented some patches, and then the contributor submitted new
> > patches(thanks!), but they removed the old ones from JIRA. Sometimes it
> > makes me confused, because the patches' names are same but they are actually
> > a new version, further, it makes the former discussion on the JIRA invalid
> > because they are based on the old patches. So I'd like to propose this for
> > discussion:
> >
> > 5. if for any reasons, someone needed to submit a new patch for some issue,
> > don't delete the old one, but named the new ones with version number.
> Yeah, one of the annoying things is that JIRA doesn't tell you which
> patch(es) are current or not, so it's a bit difficult to know if it's
> just the last one or a combination of the above. I guess there's no
> way of configuring JIRA to show up 'obsoleted' patches on a bug, is
> there, thus allowing them to be kept but displayed differently
> somehow?
If you add a new attachment with the same name then the old one will be grayed.
Descriptive comments for each patch should resolve this issue anyway.

SY, Alexey