Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mikhail.a.markov@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=nZL/aoOIzUclGi3sy3X/H4yriDz6yg4EFPbmSoUCdzR7MPiL8nIRtZBosgTE93jW2N4RJUxaxWcpKZHlOMVZRUkiIfO1rTAxge3/79+syXucRwViou4nQ8+bFSxu10Yh7DxipCUhMGfTU1xuzBq6eXP7NNjm3aykrfQvYhfa7WQ=
Message-ID: <51abf0750702070441m59c1ef2fq7b78e5b02016d8e1@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 15:41:53 +0300
From: "Mikhail Markov" <mikhail.a.markov@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [apps] Problem starting Geronimo 1.2 beta
In-Reply-To: <27D5D7D7-3690-432C-B5A9-50C8F3897855@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_4472_33464492.1170852113936"
References: <45C932AE.9000305@pobox.com>
	 <68D2D9DF-C172-4398-AF44-583A887E540A@pobox.com>
	 <BB0B8ABD-6091-40ED-9945-B589E56BE92B@pobox.com>
	 <51abf0750702070246x2f46e3f1w3d53eff99e18cd07@mail.gmail.com>
	 <124E895C-ABCF-459C-A932-26F5951A1257@pobox.com>
	 <51abf0750702070339h6a2c6ba0lba2d583380095e8f@mail.gmail.com>
	 <C51F5C96-C27C-43E6-BFBF-768636F319FF@pobox.com>
	 <51abf0750702070423k40c375c0u4b03f7c8c369f67a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <27D5D7D7-3690-432C-B5A9-50C8F3897855@pobox.com>

------=_Part_4472_33464492.1170852113936
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 2/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 7, 2007, at 7:23 AM, Mikhail Markov wrote:
>
> >> Why?  This code runs perfectly fine on the RI.  At best, you might
> >> argue it's not good design on G's part, but they hard-coded clogging
> >> for a reason.
> > RI does not have MX4J in bootclasspath. If you put it there -
> > Geronimo will
> > fail as well.
>
> I know.  But the fact that we are using mx4j as our jmx
> implementation shouldn't affect applications.  So we have to make it
> appear that mx4j isn't there

>
> >> Note that when I do drop clogging into the boootclasspath, Geronimo
> >> still doesn't start :)
> > Well, there are some other open issues against Geronimo which could
> > prevents it from starting on non-RI JDKs :-)
> > See, for example, http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2015,
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1804,
>
> The first shouldn't stop it from coming up.  The second seems to, but
> we can solve that w/ an addition to our suncompat package, right?


We could workaround everything :-) but as Geronimo is an Apache project it
seems more natural to me to influence them fixing this issue, moreover
hadcoding name of JNDI provider is not a good thing anyway.

Regards,
Mikhail

geir
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > On 2/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Mikhail Markov wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yes, sure this is classloader problem, but MX4J has a nice
> >> > mechanizm of
> >> > choosing loggers:
> >> > it either use the default java.util.logging, or, if
> >> > 'mx4j.log.prototype'
> >> > property is set, the logger specified in this property.
> >> > Geronimo just hard-coded commons-logging and does not allow users
> >> > to specify
> >> > another logging facilities.
> >> > If we could use j.u.l then Geronimo will probably start without
> >> > problems.
> >> > So, IMHO, partially this is also a Geronimo bug.
> >>
> >> Why?  This code runs perfectly fine on the RI.  At best, you might
> >> argue it's not good design on G's part, but they hard-coded clogging
> >> for a reason.
> >>
> >> Note that when I do drop clogging into the boootclasspath, Geronimo
> >> still doesn't start :)
> >>
> >> geir
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Mikhail
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 2/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Feb 7, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Mikhail Markov wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > JFYI: there is also a specific JIRA in Geronimo describing the
> >> >> > hardcoded
> >> >> > commons-logging logger:  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/
> >> >> > GERONIMO-2595.
> >> >>
> >> >> THanks - I linked that to HARMONY-1259.  I don't think this is a
> >> >> logging problem per se, but a classloader issue.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Regards,
> >> >> > Mikhail
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 2/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Ok - this is the old problem of hiding things on our
> >> bootclasspath
> >> >> >> like mx4j from apps.  G uses mx4j, and it looks for commons-
> >> >> logging.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm going to start a new thread, because this is a
> >> problem... :/
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Feb 6, 2007, at 9:22 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > Yah, this is the same thing in
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-1259
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > (and we can't seem to start JBoss either... :)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > On Feb 6, 2007, at 9:00 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I remember we had a similar looking problem a while ago,
> >> but I
> >> >> >> >> thought it was solved.  Building DRLVM+Classlib from SVN
> >> >> head, and
> >> >> >> >> trying simply to start Geronimo 1.2 beta (tomcat version), I
> >> >> get
> >> >> >> >> this :
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> 01:53:58,407 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while
> >> starting;
> >> >> >> >> GBean is now in the FAILED state:
> >> >> >> >> abstractName="org.apache.geronimo.configs/rmi-naming/1.2-
> >> >> beta/car?
> >> >> >> >> ServiceModule=org.apache.geronimo.configs/rmi-naming/1.2-
> >> beta/
> >> >> >> >> car,j2eeType=GBean,name=MBeanServerReference"
> >> >> >> >> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/commons/logging/
> >> >> >> LogFactory
> >> >> >> >>         at mx4j.log.Log.createLogger(Log.java:209)
> >> >> >> >>         at mx4j.log.Log.getLogger(Log.java:178)
> >> >> >> >>         at javax.management.MBeanServerFactory.getLogger
> >> >> >> >> (MBeanServerFactory.java:34)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> javax.management.MBeanServerFactory.findMBeanServer
> >> >> >> >> (MBeanServerFactory.java)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> org.apache.geronimo.system.jmx.RealMBeanServerReference.<init>
> >> >> >> >> (RealMBeanServerReference.java:33)
> >> >> >> >>         at java.lang.reflect.VMReflection.newClassInstance
> >> >> >> >> (VMReflection.java)
> >> >> >> >>         at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance
> >> >> >> >> (Constructor.java:298)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.createInstance
> >> >> >> >> (GBeanInstance.java:921)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.attemptFullStart
> >> >> >> >> (GBeanInstanceState.java:263)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.start
> >> >> >> >> (GBeanInstanceState.java:99)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstanceState.startRecursive
> >> >> >> >> (GBeanInstanceState.java:120)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> org.apache.geronimo.gbean.runtime.GBeanInstance.startRecursive
> >> >> >> >> (GBeanInstance.java:542)
> >> >> >> >>         at
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> org.apache.geronimo.kernel.basic.BasicKernel.startRecursiveGBean
> >> >> >> >> (BasicKernel.java:378)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> I'll start digging through JIRAs, but I thought we had this
> >> >> >> solved.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> geir
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>

------=_Part_4472_33464492.1170852113936--