From dev-return-23941-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Mon Feb 05 14:29:48 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61101 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2007 14:29:47 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Feb 2007 14:29:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 31818 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2007 14:29:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31788 invoked by uid 500); 5 Feb 2007 14:29:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 31769 invoked by uid 99); 5 Feb 2007 14:29:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:29:41 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of richard.liangyx@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.234] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:29:31 -0800 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1350961wra for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:29:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CMC9Y7mndquAxhpCNK6rvzRTsjQZrgGplQZ+QCVHOBCgUV7JeUCkERr43/LpYreG4lZJLIx6r3mnkD51NXKQ04Xot9CEusGuWS5LScjvTo4+xj1AqFe+E2DezQU890NmhFljruy3f6zNwCuDFHpHUXpZMZsy3WSxENjscZ2ZPSQ= Received: by 10.78.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr1072875hue.1170685750054; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:29:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.186.13 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Feb 2007 06:29:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 22:29:10 +0800 From: "Richard Liang" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [general] Using acronyms HY, HUT, EUT, EHWA and so on In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e47b64f0701252206p330c954td61f851d34178cdb@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I'd like to use "full name". ;-) On 1/26/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:06 AM, Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Currently I'm experimenting with HARMONY-2655: [buildtest][cc] > > iterative > > classlib tests runs incorporating. > > It introduce new acronym for build-and-test infra - HUT (Harmony Unit > > Tests). > > > > Does anybody have allergy on acronyms? (I know that Geir dislikes > > 'HY') > > HUT makes sense to me, because it's an acronym. HY never did, > because it isn't. > > If you followed the "HY" pattern, you'd call the HUT a HYUTTS. > > geir > > > > > > Thanks, > > Stepan Mishura > > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > > -- Richard Liang China Development Lab, IBM