harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yang Paulex" <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira][general] Good issue resolution guideline update
Date Tue, 06 Feb 2007 08:56:52 GMT
2007/2/6, Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com>:
>
> On 06/02/07, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I also had some thoughts to keep the patch history, recently I reviewed
> and
> > commented some patches, and then the contributor submitted new
> > patches(thanks!), but they removed the old ones from JIRA. Sometimes it
> > makes me confused, because the patches' names are same but they are
> actually
> > a new version, further, it makes the former discussion on the JIRA
> invalid
> > because they are based on the old patches. So I'd like to propose this
> for
> > discussion:
> >
> > 5. if for any reasons, someone needed to submit a new patch for some
> issue,
> > don't delete the old one, but named the new ones with version number.
>
> Yeah, one of the annoying things is that JIRA doesn't tell you which
> patch(es) are current or not, so it's a bit difficult to know if it's
> just the last one or a combination of the above. I guess there's no
> way of configuring JIRA to show up 'obsoleted' patches on a bug, is
> there, thus allowing them to be kept but displayed differently
> somehow?


I have no idea:(....generally in this case, I'll check the comments and
click the link of "manage attachments" to get more details, and then try to
understand what should do...

Alex.
>



-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Labotary
IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message