harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Yang Paulex" <paulex.y...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][test]Test Coverage
Date Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:30:59 GMT
Seems this mail didn't reach the mailing list, resend it...please ignore if
you have got it.

And if no other volunteers, I'd like to update the detail information on my
apache home.

2007/1/30, Yang Paulex <paulex.yang@gmail.com>:
>
> I noticed that the test coverage data wiki[1] hasn't been updated since
> Oct. 2, and the detailed information page[2] has disappeared for some time,
> any volunteer to recover and maintain this information?
>
> Further, I'm thinking about the classes cannot be instrumented by
> Emma(say, j.u.Properties, j.l.Class, etc), I'd like try to find some way
> to generate coverage data for them.
>
> I think it is time for classlib guys to pay more attention on the code
> quality/performance, etc, improve the test coverage rate may be a good
> start. Currently, seems the average method coverage is less than 60%, i.e.,
> almost 40% methods are not tested at all, I cannot sleep everytime I think
> about this;-). And as a rough comparison, GNU Classpath has 50K test
> cases[3], while Harmony only has 20K. (But, possible for us to run GNU
> Classpath's Mauve test cases on Harmony? any legal and technical issues?)
>
> [1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Coverage_information
> [2] http://viv.byethost15.com/
> [3] http://www.object-refinery.com/classpath/mauve/report/
>
> --
> Paulex Yang
> China Software Development Labotary
> IBM




-- 
Paulex Yang
China Software Development Labotary
IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message