harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [general] Harmony enabling at Windows / x86_64
Date Mon, 19 Feb 2007 17:21:33 GMT

On Feb 19, 2007, at 11:26 AM, Gregory Shimansky wrote:

> Ivan Zvolsky wrote:
>> I have also put my efforts with drlvm building to HARMONY-3196.  
>> The patch
>> makes drlvm buildable on windows/em64t (and shouldn't break  
>> building on
>> other platforms).
>> It still has some things to do, which I described in subtasks for
>> HARMONY-3196.
>
> I looked at the patches and I have a question. You've added amd64  
> architecture in some select statements in the build along with  
> em64t flag. I thought that from the build point they are  
> equivalent, and build.arch property is defined in build.xml for all  
> kinds of arch (x86_64, em64t, amd64) to be equal to "em64t". Why  
> add another flag in build files?

And whatever the answer turns out to be, can we instead simply settle  
on x86_64 please?

geir

>
>> On 2/16/07, Ivan Zvolsky <i.zvolsky@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Some time ago, I found out that Harmony is not buildable on  
>>> Windows /
>>> x86_64 (EM64T).
>>> I tried to reanimate at least the build which has required to  
>>> update both
>>> classlib and drlvm build files, create stubs for some functions,  
>>> etc.
>>>
>>> I've put my results (for now only classlib part) to HARMONY-3188.
>>> Could someone take a look? The comments are welcome.
>>>
>>> In particular, Geir might want to look at the first comment in the
>>> description :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> -- 
> Gregory
>


Mime
View raw message