Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76722 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2007 01:07:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2007 01:07:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 3682 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2007 01:07:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 3414 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2007 01:07:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 3405 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2007 01:07:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:07:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ustczz@gmail.com designates 64.233.162.231 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.162.231] (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.231) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:59 -0800 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id j2so23126nzf for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eVuhjBoDLClo0srbkfJAF6k09WuIXQe5Ic+WvuJnSM0/P2FGBC0Qe5cZ1o2rO0mXc3DkKgndE15y7NrZAb3y0uZLKRLp1K3ytz/qmsPSQVm11sjiKD6p2rdgNznfaer4g5OlVeZF4meqwXM/CsKpfCLn3TKBNKYIvyVEXYag+pY= Received: by 10.65.233.16 with SMTP id k16mr249770qbr.1169600798425; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.233.16 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:06:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6342af3e0701231706nceb6e51g648ccdc9683c976e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 09:06:38 +0800 From: zouqiong To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm][opt] How to get object access sequence during runtime. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_207210_25782169.1169600798340" References: <6342af3e0701212342n561cp484751d7cded0366@mail.gmail.com> <6342af3e0701230303t581dfd00w58ffe06bb11c33b3@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_207210_25782169.1169600798340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline It means that Chip Multi-processor. I want to know whether there're some optimization face to CMP. 2007/1/23, Mikhail Fursov : > > On 1/23/07, zouqiong wrote: > > > > Hi Mikhail: > > I want to ask you a question: Is there any researches about Java in > > CMP? > > > Sorry, it's the end of the day, so I'm very slow.. > What do you mean by "CMP" ? Container-managed persistence or 'compare' op? > > -- > Mikhail Fursov > > -- Best Regards, Qiong,Zou ------=_Part_207210_25782169.1169600798340--