Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 39039 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2007 12:36:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Jan 2007 12:36:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10105 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 12:36:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 10078 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jan 2007 12:36:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 10069 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jan 2007 12:36:58 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:36:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.174] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:36:48 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so385043uge for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:36:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OK+1DbkxZ//PfQ/Qqu8Evz0i+P2wQptT9uerekUyimsg+h6vSgy4F3QABVwE78NqYvCcj2dxaVcoTjgzWqKpdRLL7FaLH+PbwFMZy8SNekj6HTGoy7hBB7JwpLsFMc6QKGhPFSyIq/LYrO4cRs877j78+jGktkss9C+lIL7EF5k= Received: by 10.66.221.6 with SMTP id t6mr1650269ugg.1168518986870; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:36:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?9.20.183.73? ( [195.212.29.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j1sm756504ugf.2007.01.11.04.36.23; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:36:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45A62F42.9070507@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:36:18 +0000 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm] stress.Stack causes a, "sigsegv in vm code" on a 2 cpu rhel4 box References: <4dd1f3f00701101326r778199d7wcb4e0bc4b467c72c@mail.gmail.com> <4dd1f3f00701102336v29dd676dw1e225714648e84d0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4dd1f3f00701102336v29dd676dw1e225714648e84d0@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Weldon Washburn wrote: > This actually brings up something that would really be nice to have, a > rollback list. I am thinking a short list of OS/HW combos that a > regression means a compulsory SVN rollback. The expectation is that every > committer would have access to a full set of machines on the rollback list. > For starts, I think the list should be: > > 1) > single ia32 cpu laptop w/ WindowsXP > 2) > 4 CPU SMP w/ Linux ia32 > 3) > 4 CPU SMP w/ Linux 64-bit (em64t) > > > Thoughts? Cool -- do I send my shipping address to you? :-) How can you make such an expectation? Tim