harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gregory Shimansky <gshiman...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] gcc version 4.x as our "default" compiler version?
Date Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:55:15 GMT
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
> Gregory Shimansky skrev  den 10-01-2007 19:02:
>> I am surprised too. I tried to push moving to gcc 4.x because I use it 
>> on all systems and we've had cases when code which compiles on 3.x 
>> failed to compiled on 4.x because of more strict syntax checks.
> Does this also apply when -Wall is in effect?

I think we have -Wall already specified for some native sources. Yes, 
gcc invents new warnings/erros as it evolves. Consider this link [1] 
(see C++ section), it means that some previously allowed C++ constructs 
is not allowed any more.

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/changes.html


View raw message