harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexey Petrenko" <alexey.a.petre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] 100% 1.5 API coverage for Harmony and CORBA.
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 14:11:01 GMT
2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
> w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
That would be great. Can you suggest something?

SY, Alexey

> On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>
> > Geir,
> >
> > I could not find any spec for Java CORBA API at all. I've asked here
> > (yoko-dev) but nobody could point me to such spec. So it seems that
> > every CORBA implementation implements its own vision.
> > Moreover RI has CORBA 2.3.1 implementation with number of exceptions
> > [1].
> >
> > SY, Alexey
> >
> > [1]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/CORBA/doc-files/
> > compliance.html
> >
> >
> > 2007/1/11, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> >>
> >> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
> >>
> >> > One of the areas with less then 100% coverage in Harmony is org.omg
> >> > packages. I've attached the japitools result page with the current
> >> > Harmony status in this area. The summary is the following:
> >> 84.52%. To
> >> > get 100% we need to fix 6 classes, 28 interfaces, 11 methods and
> >> > implement 2 packages, 21 classes, 12 interfaces, 72 methods, 2
> >> > constructors.
> >> >
> >> > There are two main causes of such situation:
> >> > 1. Yoko implements CORBA 2.4 while Java 5 SE implements 2.3
> >> > 2. There is no any spec for CORBA implementation on Java.
> >>
> >> Can you provide some more detail?  Isn't 2.4 a superset?  How can
> >> there ever be interop?
> >>
> >> I'm a little surprised that CORBA 2.4 doesn't contain all the
> >> classes/
> >> interfaces/methods of CORBA 2.3.
> >>
> >> geir
> >>
> >>
>
>

Mime
View raw message