harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [general] 100% 1.5 API coverage for Harmony and CORBA.
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2007 13:07:56 GMT
so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this  
w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...

geir

On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:

> Geir,
>
> I could not find any spec for Java CORBA API at all. I've asked here
> (yoko-dev) but nobody could point me to such spec. So it seems that
> every CORBA implementation implements its own vision.
> Moreover RI has CORBA 2.3.1 implementation with number of exceptions 
> [1].
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> [1]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/CORBA/doc-files/ 
> compliance.html
>
>
> 2007/1/11, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>>
>> > One of the areas with less then 100% coverage in Harmony is org.omg
>> > packages. I've attached the japitools result page with the current
>> > Harmony status in this area. The summary is the following:  
>> 84.52%. To
>> > get 100% we need to fix 6 classes, 28 interfaces, 11 methods and
>> > implement 2 packages, 21 classes, 12 interfaces, 72 methods, 2
>> > constructors.
>> >
>> > There are two main causes of such situation:
>> > 1. Yoko implements CORBA 2.4 while Java 5 SE implements 2.3
>> > 2. There is no any spec for CORBA implementation on Java.
>>
>> Can you provide some more detail?  Isn't 2.4 a superset?  How can
>> there ever be interop?
>>
>> I'm a little surprised that CORBA 2.4 doesn't contain all the  
>> classes/
>> interfaces/methods of CORBA 2.3.
>>
>> geir
>>
>>


Mime
View raw message