harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Naveen Neelakantam <neela...@uiuc.edu>
Subject Re: [drlvm] stress.Mix problems -- should it prevent committing patches?
Date Mon, 08 Jan 2007 19:06:05 GMT
It did run once upon a time.  I'll try and see if I can figure out  
when that was.

Naveen

On Jan 8, 2007, at 12:20 PM, Weldon Washburn wrote:

> On 1/8/07, Rana Dasgupta <rdasgupt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/7/07, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >What is in the backlog?
>> >
>> > >I was testing on em64t dual core, and it failed there too.
>>
>>
>> Which one failed in 64 bit mode? The basic stress.Mix or Weldon's
>> MegaSpawn?
>> And did it hang, or run out of memory? Running out of memory on  
>> these 64
>> bit
>> systems is not easy even under the conditions of this test.
>>
>> >I think we broke something basic.  By just ignoring it and  
>> continuing
>> > >with commits that are related, it seems like we're going going  
>> to get
>> > >in deeper trouble...
>>
>>
>> I am a little confused too. The stress.Mix test can randomly land  
>> up doing
>> unbounded thread creation( as in Weldon's repro case )...and I  
>> would think
>> that it is not unreasonable to fail in such a case. The RI fails  
>> too. But
>> I
>> don't understand how it never failed before.
>>
>>
> I attempted to determine if there ever was an old svn revision that  
> would
> pass stress.Mix test on my rhel 2-way SMP box.  Unfortunately the  
> unified
> classlib/vm build changed the how one gets an old revision from the
> repository.  I don't know if its worth trying to resurect an old svn
> revision.  I am hoping someone will confirm if stress.Mix ever ran
> successfully on 2-way and 4-way boxes.  This seems way easier than  
> trying to
> reconstruct old build.xml files.
>
>
> -- 
> Weldon Washburn
> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division


Mime
View raw message