harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Morozova, Nadezhda" <nadezhda.moroz...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM
Date Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:46:47 GMT
Thanks for all the effort, Mikhail.
I'll see if I actually committed only the doc files, would be a pity.
December holiday rush, was it? :) 

Cheers, 
Nadya
 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:mloenko@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 12:44 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM
>
>I've committed the roadmap. I've noticed that once the site is built,
many
>files differ from what is in svn. Seems like the files were edited
manually
>in the docs/ directory
>
>For example the last revision of
>xdocs/auth_cont_quest.xml
>is 476551
>
>while
>docs/auth_cont_quest.html
>has also 480904 after 476551
>
>Nadya, either you missed guidelines in standard/site/README.txt or
>I missed that we agreed not to follow them :)
>
>Thanks,
>Mikhail
>
>
>
>2007/1/12, Morozova, Nadezhda <nadezhda.morozova@intel.com>:
>> >Also, maybe we can start seeing if it makes sense to have 1:1
>> >relationships between certain web and wiki pages, so that it's easy
>> >to find the right place to add stuff, from the perspective of the
site?
>> >
>>
>> +1 interesting idea
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nadya
>>
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
>> >Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 9:23 PM
>> >To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>> >Subject: Re: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM
>> >
>> >Yep -
>> >
>> >I think having the info on the site, and then a link at the bottom
>> >with "For most recent updates, look here!" or something, allows us
to
>> >capture the information on the website (and then also bundle it in
>> >distros etc), as well as make it easy for people to find updates.
>> >
>> >Also, maybe we can start seeing if it makes sense to have 1:1
>> >relationships between certain web and wiki pages, so that it's easy
>> >to find the right place to add stuff, from the perspective of the
site?
>> >
>> >geir
>> >
>> >On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2007/1/11, Konovalova, Svetlana <svetlana.konovalova@intel.com>:
>> >>> IMHO it makes sense to add a link from [1] to [2].
>> >>>
>> >>> >I suggest to move content of the wiki page to the website
>> >>> The content changes all the time, ant it's easier to edit wiki
pages
>> >>> than site ones...
>> >>
>> >> Why DRLVM is different? We have all other components roadmap on
the
>> >> web site
>> >> asnd it would be logical to have all them in a single style
>> >>
>> >> Moreover the set of links (categories of items) looks rather
stable:
>> >>
>> >> Core VM Development Items
>> >> JIT Development Tasks
>> >> Known non bug issues and limitations.
>> >> kernel classes/natives code sharing.
>> >> TODO Items
>> >> Documentation TODO
>> >>
>> >> So the items themselves (that change indeed) would be on a wiki
>> >> anyway...
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Mikhail
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Best regards,
>> >>> Sveta
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: Mikhail Loenko [mailto:mloenko@gmail.com]
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 10:30 AM
>> >>> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>> >>> Subject: [doc][drlvm] roadmap for DRLVM
>> >>>
>> >>> I've noticed that we have some duplication: there is a
placeholder
>> >>> for
>> >>> DRLVM
>> >>> roadmap [1] that is empty on the web site. And there is a roadmap
on
>> >>> the wiki [2].
>> >>> I suggest to move content of the wiki page to the website
>> >>>
>> >>> Does anybody object?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Mikhail
>> >>>
>> >>> [1] http://harmony.apache.org/roadmap.html#DRLVM
>> >>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_List_for_DRLVM
>> >>>
>>

Mime
View raw message