Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 63147 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 13:00:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 13:00:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 86111 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2006 13:00:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86075 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2006 13:00:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 86066 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2006 13:00:17 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 05:00:17 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gcjhd-harmony-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.2] (HELO ciao.gmane.org) (80.91.229.2) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 04:59:41 -0800 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gu7Da-0003f2-EV for dev@harmony.apache.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:58:46 +0100 Received: from msfwpr01.ims.intel.com ([62.118.80.132]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:58:46 +0100 Received: from gshimansky by msfwpr01.ims.intel.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 13:58:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@harmony.apache.org From: Gregory Shimansky Subject: Re: [drlvm] Is DRLVM ok now? Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:58:37 +0300 Lines: 57 Message-ID: References: <7273946b0612120156h1a5397d8i3f5aa9c76a701db4@mail.gmail.com> <7273946b0612120205v34f64117pa0fd2296b6bcaaf5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: msfwpr01.ims.intel.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) In-Reply-To: Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org If the tests still fail for you, could you give any details on what platform, which tests and how they fail? Alexey Petrenko wrote: > twice :) > > 2006/12/12, Evgueni Brevnov : >> Alexey, >> >> Did you try to clean and rebuild? It helped to me. >> >> Evgueni >> >> On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > 2006/12/12, Vladimir Ivanov : >> > > On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I'm running vm tests not classlib unit tests... Does CC runs >> them too? >> > > Yes. The CC builds DRLVM and CLASSLIB modules and runs tests for >> both. >> > I believe that vm build.xml was changed accordingly while deploy >> > directory changes... And this change should not affect vm tests... >> > >> > SY, Alexey >> > >> > > > 2006/12/12, Vladimir Ivanov : >> > > > > The CC is working OK (after the small patch: changing >> deploy/jre to >> > > > > deploy/jdk/jre for path to DRLVM). >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, Vladimir >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Guys, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > after drlvm update today I see failures of DRLVM tests both >> on Windows >> > > > > > 2003 Server and SUSE9. >> > > > > > Does anybody else see the failures? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > SY, Alexey >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > -- Gregory