Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33170 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2006 11:10:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Dec 2006 11:10:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 89769 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2006 11:10:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89603 invoked by uid 500); 12 Dec 2006 11:10:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 89539 invoked by uid 99); 12 Dec 2006 11:10:52 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:10:51 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com designates 72.14.214.234 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.214.234] (HELO hu-out-0506.google.com) (72.14.214.234) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:10:41 -0800 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 28so1217240hug for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:10:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=E3m0jTRMOQoO58vdk7msUoi5Gc6sPhgiUzVFOHp59CVKMCIqgkObwjL265HLsy+5NGejPrSZAjZu9xkCLUc6yCaUep+kHxJcgADG2rtLMIoBoPZdZiN6nfknrdod5j1cCzuY4OsJCVz0TKkwH/SIABwOIBuKenSGOHg9uCNI9bU= Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr2120030hue.1165921819544; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:10:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.97.11 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:10:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:10:19 +0600 From: "Evgueni Brevnov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [drlvm] Is DRLVM ok now? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7273946b0612120156h1a5397d8i3f5aa9c76a701db4@mail.gmail.com> <7273946b0612120205v34f64117pa0fd2296b6bcaaf5@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Alexey, Did you try to clean and rebuild? It helped to me. Evgueni On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/12/12, Vladimir Ivanov : > > On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > > > > I'm running vm tests not classlib unit tests... Does CC runs them too? > > Yes. The CC builds DRLVM and CLASSLIB modules and runs tests for both. > I believe that vm build.xml was changed accordingly while deploy > directory changes... And this change should not affect vm tests... > > SY, Alexey > > > > 2006/12/12, Vladimir Ivanov : > > > > The CC is working OK (after the small patch: changing deploy/jre to > > > > deploy/jdk/jre for path to DRLVM). > > > > > > > > Thanks, Vladimir > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12/12/06, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > > > > > after drlvm update today I see failures of DRLVM tests both on Windows > > > > > 2003 Server and SUSE9. > > > > > Does anybody else see the failures? > > > > > > > > > > SY, Alexey > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >