Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-22095-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 89350 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2006 04:17:46 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 04:17:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 9823 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2006 04:17:48 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9792 invoked by uid 500); 20 Dec 2006 04:17:47 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@harmony.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@harmony.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@harmony.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.harmony.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 9783 invoked by uid 99); 20 Dec 2006 04:17:47 -0000
Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:17:47 -0800
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ivavladimir@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.92.168 as permitted sender)
Received: from [66.249.92.168] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.168)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:17:37 -0800
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so1675824uge
        for <dev@harmony.apache.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:17:16 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=sMnx/KqcW2GtnwDGO8num3EqiP0rIWSZEPXtyvebJAG8nZH7bBx3B22++Tnq4WbfDi4xc4zxd1UtfeUSIpOW6jbj7fVuAiAxbb9WUbgxpZ4JONswe5Lf1V/TicSacVDzpJJ5u4+TjE/GZnecjVPcpL/hUBCb2oYnfyrbDpDOkeA=
Received: by 10.78.39.16 with SMTP id m16mr4633924hum.1166588235734;
        Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.145.6 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:17:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <7273946b0612192017n57062b71sa8a317270ec1d36b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:17:15 +0600
From: "Vladimir Ivanov" <ivavladimir@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [drlvm][smoke-tests] the smoke tests of DRLVM failed today on the
 WindowsXP
In-Reply-To: <u4prsgfkw.fsf@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_19488_4625444.1166588235663"
References: <7273946b0612172126j1b089342q34fc780149508536@mail.gmail.com>
	 <458692FA.5070508@pobox.com>
	 <e79e5b390612180522r372bcc4amf35122cb7639ed25@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4586997E.6030702@pobox.com>
	 <bc79dd600612180551q10da49cfk21f58033ef6c4187@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4586ABC6.5050801@pobox.com>
	 <bc79dd600612180700t490c0a29ic465a718d84193bf@mail.gmail.com>
	 <f944d83d0612181813i6c206a5p86877241ba2bd4b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <7273946b0612182033o418b891fxb608174e4f5cd544@mail.gmail.com>
	 <u4prsgfkw.fsf@gmail.com>
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

------=_Part_19488_4625444.1166588235663
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Today the other smoke test gc.FinAlloc finished with exit code -1073741819
on winXP.
Could somebody evaluate it?
 thanks, Vladimir

     [exec] java_test_smoke_with_jit_or_interpreter:
     [exec]      [echo] Using jitrino
     [exec]      [echo]
     [exec]      [echo]         ==================================
     [exec]      [echo]         Smoke tests
     [exec]      [echo]         ==================================
     [exec]      [echo]
     [exec]      [echo] Excluding Tests from
C:\cc.harmony\trunk\cc\projects\drlvm\trunk\build\make\excludes\exclude.drlvm_smoke.windows.x86.jit

     [exec]      [echo]
<snip>
     [exec]      [echo] Running test : exception.NPE
     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED : exception.NPE
     [exec]      [echo] Running test : gc.FinAlloc
     [exec]      [java] Java Result: -1073741819
     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED : gc.FinAlloc


On 19 Dec 2006 19:50:23 +0600, Egor Pasko <egor.pasko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On the 0x244 day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
> > On 12/19/06, Alexey Varlamov < alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > -X does not work, there are predefined options already like -Xverify
> > > or -Xint, while we need arbitrary key[=value] strings. As for -XD vs
> > > -XX, I feel no strong preference, just thought that -XD is
> > > comprehensible enough...
> > > So if we have more than 1 voice to do the renaming, I will do it.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 to rename it. For me the '-XD' prefix is inconvenient way to specify
> vm
> > arguments (I never met it before).
> > I prefer '-XX'.
>
> Okay, being not a HoSpot options guru I felt no preference. Quick
> googling uncovered [1] for me. Examples:
> 1. -XX:CompileThreshold=10000 // this one is exactly like ours
> 2. -XX:+UseParallelOldGC // it can be equiv. of -XX:UseParallelOldGC=on
>
> I am (+1) to this apprach as it aligns with what people (=HotSpot
> options gurus) are used to. -XD should beworking with a warning for a
> while so that we have time to update our scripts.
>
> [1] JavaTM HotSpot VM Options
>    http://java.sun.com/docs/hotspot/VMOptions.html
>
> >  Thanks, Vladimir
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Alexey
> > >
> > > 2006/12/18, Mikhail Fursov <mike.fursov@gmail.com>:
> > > > Alexey Varlamov was the person who completed and applied this patch.
>
> > > Let's
> > > > wait for him, if he agree to create and apply another one.
> > > >
> > > > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > > > > > What is the plus to have -X or -XX instead of -XD? These are
> > > internal
> > > > > > options anyway, we can't be compatible here with RI.
> > > > >
> > > > > Convention, really.   People grok that -XX are internal
> > > options...  they
> > > > > won't have to ask the question like I did :)
> > > > >
> > > > > geir
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. < geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> > > > > >> > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. < geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> > > > > >> >> > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> How could the window be closed manually with the
> automated
> > > > > >> framework?
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > It was fully automated until HARMONY-1925 had been
> committed.
> > > > > After
> > > > > >> >> that
> > > > > >> >> > setting -Dvm.assert_dialog=0 in smoke.test.xml stopped
> working
> > > and
> > > > > >> >> assert
> > > > > >> >> > dialogs might pop up. This has just been fixed in
> HARMONY-2763
> > > (-D
> > > > > >> >> replaced
> > > > > >> >> > with -XD).
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> What's an "-XD" option again?
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > AFAIK, HARMONY-1925 separated "standard" and "internal"
> > > properties
> > > > > >> > passing to VM. "Standard" properties are set with -D while
> > > "internal"
> > > > > >> are
> > > > > >> > set with -XD.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Why not just "X" or "XX"?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Elena
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > geir
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Elena
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > geir
> > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <
> evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >> On 12/18/06, Elena Semukhina <
> elena.semukhina@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov < ivavladimir@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > The other problem, even with this return code the
> > > 'build
> > > > > >> test'
> > > > > >> >> >> >> reports
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > SUCCESSFUL status :(
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Possibly it is SUCCESSFUL because some assert
> dialogs
> > > > > appeared
> > > > > >> >> and
> > > > > >> >> >> have
> > > > > >> >> >> >> ?> been closed manually.
> > > > > >> >> >> >> No. The build is successful because all tests are
> actually
> > > > > >> passed.
> > > > > >> >> >> >> Current mechanism doesn't use java result to determine
> if
> > > the
> > > > > >> test
> > > > > >> >> is
> > > > > >> >> >> >> passed or not. Instead it looks into log file for a
> > > "PASSED"
> > > > > or
> > > > > >> >> >> >> "FAILED" key word to decide if test was successful.
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> > If the Assert dialog window is closed manually,
> "PASSED"
> > > could
> > > > > be
> > > > > >> >> >> > written to
> > > > > >> >> >> > the log file.
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> > Elena
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> > Evgueni
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >> After HARMONY-1925 has been applied, we should pass
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > internal VM properties with -XD option. The
> > > > > >> >> >> vm.assert_dialogproperty=0
> > > > > >> >> >> >> is
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > still passed with -D. I created
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2763with
> > > > > patch
> > > > > >> for
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > smoke.test.xml.
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Elena
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Thanks, Vladimir
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > PS Should we exclude this test if it failed
> > > time-to-time
> > > > > for
> > > > > >> >> >> ~month?
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <
> > > evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > Hi,
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > The only suspicious place is "[exec] [java] Java
> > > Result:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> -1073741819".
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > I've observed such behaviour from time to time
> for a
> > > one
> > > > > >> >> >> month at
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > least."[exec][java] Java Result: 1" &
> "[exec][java]
> > > Java
> > > > > >> >> Result:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> 130"
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > are expected results.
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > Evgueni
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov <
> ivavladimir@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > The smoke tests of DRLVM failed today on the
> > > > > WindowsXP.
> > > > > >> >> Could
> > > > > >> >> >> >> somebody
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > reproduce/fix it?
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >  Thanks, Vladimir
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
> C:\cc.harmony\trunk\cc\projects\drlvm\trunk\build\make\excludes\exclude.drlvm_smoke.windows.x86.jit
>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > > <snip>
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > >> >> >> perf.CreateManyExceptions_depth
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result:
> -1073741819
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > perf.MultiThreadsSimple
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > perf.SeveralThreads
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > perf.StressCornerSize
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > perf.StressCornerSize_a
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> perf.ThrowMany
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > >> perf.ThrowManyExceptions
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > >> >> >> perf.ThrowManyExceptions_depth
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > perf.ThrowMany_depth
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> reflect.GetMethod
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result: 1
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > shutdown.TestFatalError
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result: 130
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> > > > > shutdown.TestInterrupt
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED :
> shutdown.TestLock
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > --
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> >> >> >> > Elena
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >>
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Mikhail Fursov
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
> --
> Egor Pasko
>
>

------=_Part_19488_4625444.1166588235663--