Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com
 designates 64.233.182.189 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=T6SCyr8TDZ3ryfTZox9vY/OxSHizhipetwqUzocw4k6vTxDrNSOv9xIUtsNtRm77GOVaklScsmdq3wDujcmeJacq79APUwFXrPItGCUwNpTaXmw9QjfEVO++P8XfrMqH621iuALn+GdhcaVFodYliHkUnqREaMeRUSVW8FFlYg8=
Message-ID: <4d0b24970612140501t4a7dab5cp7611dfbbf8893ebd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:01:39 +0800
From: "Andrew Zhang" <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][sql] A RI's bug of SerialBlob.getBytes(long position,
 int length)?
In-Reply-To: <2c9597b90612140130y6eddb4d4ha678257f717c7b49@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_23320_3930667.1166101299452"
References: <4d0b24970612110347y65fa62f3n51b13eca0c4bd3d1@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4d0b24970612130701hed88583l7ea76f1f00203e10@mail.gmail.com>
	 <2c9597b90612140130y6eddb4d4ha678257f717c7b49@mail.gmail.com>

------=_Part_23320_3930667.1166101299452
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 12/14/06, Alexei Zakharov <alexei.zakharov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That one? If you are talking about the problem mentioned in your
> initial message


Sorry... we've agreed that the behaviour of SerialBlob.position(byte[],
long) is a bug in another thread. Yes, "This one" means the initial message
-- getByte(long, int) method. But seldom people reponsed this thread to
regard it as a bug. :)

> > public void testGetBytesJI1() throws Exception {
> > >         byte[] buf = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
> > >         SerialBlob serialBlob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > >         byte [] data = serialBlob.getBytes(2, 1);
> > >         assertEquals(1, data.length);
> > >         assertEquals(2, data[0]);
> > >    }
> > > throws SerialException with message "Invalid arguments: position
> cannot be
> > > less that 1".
>
> then +1 from me for following the spec since I don't understand RI's
> behavior at all. Please note that even the exception message itself
> contains typos :)


LOL, I just noticed "less that 1"...

Regards,
>
> 2006/12/13, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com>:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > How about this one? It seems a bug of RI too.
> >
> > Any comments? Thanks!
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Andrew Zhang <zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks,
> > > SerialBlob spec points out that getBytes(long position, int length)
> should
> > > throw SerialException if the given starting position is out of bounds.
> But
> > > RI also throws SerialException when the position is in the bound of
> the
> > > array in some other cases. Consider following code:
> > >
> > > public void testGetBytesJI1() throws Exception {
> > >         byte[] buf = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
> > >         SerialBlob serialBlob = new SerialBlob(buf);
> > >         byte [] data = serialBlob.getBytes(2, 1);
> > >         assertEquals(1, data.length);
> > >         assertEquals(2, data[0]);
> > >    }
> > >
> > > IMO, the starting position 2 and the length 1 are both valid. But RI
> > > throws SerialException with message "Invalid arguments: position
> cannot be
> > > less that 1". Is it a bug of RI? Or did I missing something? Any
> > > suggestions? Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Andrew Zhang
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Andrew Zhang
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Alexei Zakharov,
> Intel ESSD
>


-- 
Best regards,
Andrew Zhang

------=_Part_23320_3930667.1166101299452--