Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: local policy)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [classlib][jmx] MX4J sources in Harmony svn
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:21:33 +0300
Message-ID: <300B70C65DCD59468957941A60716EBC04A2DD@mssmsx411>
Thread-Topic: [classlib][jmx] MX4J sources in Harmony svn
Thread-Index: Accf5U99UQh9s7OlQeGD97az5QiaNAAVXK8g
From: "Krivenko, Sergey" <sergey.krivenko@intel.com>
To: <dev@harmony.apache.org>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:nbeyer@gmail.com]
>Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:06 AM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [classlib][jmx] MX4J sources in Harmony svn
>
>There seems to be continued activity on MX4J. There's a recent bug fix
>that we haven't picked up yet. Maybe we should update to that first.
>
>-Nathan

I agree. They just released version 3.0.2 on December, 10. Can we pick
it up and start from there?

>
>On 12/14/06, Krivenko, Sergey <sergey.krivenko@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As far as I remember there was an intention to put MX4J sources into
>> "standard" Harmony svn repository (see:
>>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200609.mb
>> ox/%3c85DDB095-D112-46AC-9803-E3B5A69A3758@pobox.com%3e). Also there
are
>> 11 open JIRAs against MX4J already (not counting moving it to Java
1.5)
>> and I'd like to start working on them.
>>
>> Could anybody from the committers start doing a "gentle fork" and put
>> sources to the standard svn? Should I open a new JIRA regarding this?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sergey Krivenko
>>