harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Egor Pasko <egor.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [doc] are KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items valid?
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:20:23 GMT
On the 0x23A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> I've looked through "Known issues" page and dropped few items, which
> were resolved already:
> - Java assertions support
> - StackOverflowError support for JIT mode

why?
we do not have SOE 100% safe yet, JIT algorithms can be caught with
SOE on large bytecodes. We should estimate how much stack we can take
before each graph traversal activity. Not done yet and leads to a crash.

> Also, I suggest we remove "Limited length of buffer for reading of
> vm.properties lines" item along with the related code. There is a
> comment "this functionality is deprecated" presented for ages, and I
> never heard that anybody actually used it.
> Anyway there is similar "harmonyvm.properties" functionality and it
> has no such limitation.
> 
> 2006/12/3, Konovalova, Svetlana <svetlana.konovalova@intel.com>:
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com]
> > >Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:35 PM
> > >To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> > >Subject: Re: [doc] are KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items valid?
> > >
> > >Might I suggest that instead of asking for everyone to comment for
> > >positive, please comment only for negative with the idea that we can
> > >then discuss and then leave there (w/o comment) or remove.
> >
> > OK, I don't mind.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >I just thing that it will result in a big list of "+1" that don't seem
> > >to add much but visual clutter.
> > >
> > >
> > >I've reviewed the TODO, and each has my virtual +1 :)
> > Great! Thanks!
> > >
> > >geir
> > >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Sveta
> > >>
> > >>Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
> > >> Folks,
> > >>I found out that certain KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items mentioned in the
> > earlier version of the README file are posted nowhere, though they might
> > be relevant.
> > >> I've collected them and have added to the following wiki pages:
> > >>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/KnownNonBugIssuesAndLimitations
> > (Known Issues)
> > >> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_Items
> > (TODO)
> > >>
> > >> Would be great, if you could find a chance to review the issues to
> > determine their validity.
> > >>
> > >> IMHO if there is significant info, it should be replaced, let's say,
> > to the README.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks in advance!
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Sveta
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> 

-- 
Egor Pasko


Mime
View raw message