harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Elena Semukhina" <elena.semukh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][build] exclude files for kernel tests
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2006 12:51:11 GMT
On 11/22/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> ok - I'm fixed this to have a set of excludes for opt, jet and int - on
> x86_64, they turn out to be different.


x86_64 exclude lists differ from ones for other platforms: there are some
more excluded tests there. Are there JIRA issues which could be matched to
those failures? I'd like to add this info to the
http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/DRLVMInternalTests page.


So now, you can run linux x86_64 in the no-fork mode, and it runs to
> completion.
> On to "no regressions" :)
> I'm going to look at the smoke tests now and try to do the same thing.
> geir
> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> > I just checked in a change to the drlvm test system that uses external
> > exclude files, delineated by platform.  (I just realized that I need to
> > also separate by jit/opt/int as well, as we have that distinction on
> > x86_64 linux.  I'll do that in a sec)
> >
> > The idea is that in make/excludes are files for each os/arch and soon
> > jit.  It uses the same nomenclature as in classlib, and in fact the
> > build now 'reaches over' and imports the properties.xml file from
> > classlib build so we don't have more than open copy of that code around.
> >
> > Note that these tokens are different than what we'd using in DRLVM
> > traditionally, but we need to converge and this is a first, harmless
> > step.  I'll be slowly trying to switch DRLVM over to that token set for
> > arch and OS.
> >
> > I've tested on linux x86 and now testing on x86_64.  if someone could
> > simply give it a whirl on windows, I'd be mighty obliged
> >
> > geir


  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message