harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Fursov" <mike.fur...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm][smoke-tests] the smoke tests of DRLVM failed today on the WindowsXP
Date Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:00:34 GMT
Alexey Varlamov was the person who completed and applied this patch. Let's
wait for him, if he agree to create and apply another one.

On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Mikhail Fursov wrote:
> > What is the plus to have -X or -XX instead of -XD? These are internal
> > options anyway, we can't be compatible here with RI.
>
> Convention, really.   People grok that -XX are internal options...  they
> won't have to ask the question like I did :)
>
> geir
>
> >
> > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> >> > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> >> >> > On 12/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How could the window be closed manually with the automated
> >> framework?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It was fully automated until HARMONY-1925 had been committed.
> After
> >> >> that
> >> >> > setting -Dvm.assert_dialog=0 in smoke.test.xml stopped working
and
> >> >> assert
> >> >> > dialogs might pop up. This has just been fixed in HARMONY-2763
(-D
> >> >> replaced
> >> >> > with -XD).
> >> >>
> >> >> What's an "-XD" option again?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > AFAIK, HARMONY-1925 separated "standard" and "internal" properties
> >> > passing to VM. "Standard" properties are set with -D while "internal"
> >> are
> >> > set with -XD.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Why not just "X" or "XX"?
> >>
> >>
> >> > Elena
> >> >
> >> > geir
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Elena
> >> >> >
> >> >> > geir
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Elena Semukhina wrote:
> >> >> >> > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On 12/18/06, Elena Semukhina <elena.semukhina@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > The other problem, even with this return
code the 'build
> >> test'
> >> >> >> >> reports
> >> >> >> >> > > SUCCESSFUL status :(
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Possibly it is SUCCESSFUL because some assert
dialogs
> appeared
> >> >> and
> >> >> >> have
> >> >> >> >> ?> been closed manually.
> >> >> >> >> No. The build is successful because all tests are
actually
> >> passed.
> >> >> >> >> Current mechanism doesn't use java result to determine
if the
> >> test
> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >> passed or not. Instead it looks into log file for
a "PASSED"
> or
> >> >> >> >> "FAILED" key word to decide if test was successful.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > If the Assert dialog window is closed manually, "PASSED"
could
> be
> >> >> >> > written to
> >> >> >> > the log file.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Elena
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Evgueni
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> After HARMONY-1925 has been applied, we should pass
> >> >> >> >> > internal VM properties with -XD option. The
> >> >> >> vm.assert_dialogproperty=0
> >> >> >> >> is
> >> >> >> >> > still passed with -D. I created
> >> >> >> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2763
with
> patch
> >> for
> >> >> >> >> > smoke.test.xml.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> > Elena
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks, Vladimir
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > PS Should we exclude this test if it failed
time-to-time
> for
> >> >> >> ~month?
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > > On 12/18/06, Evgueni Brevnov <evgueni.brevnov@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > Hi,
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > The only suspicious place is "[exec]
[java] Java Result:
> >> >> >> >> -1073741819".
> >> >> >> >> > > > I've observed such behaviour from
time to time for a one
> >> >> >> month at
> >> >> >> >> > > > least."[exec][java] Java Result: 1"
& "[exec][java] Java
> >> >> Result:
> >> >> >> >> 130"
> >> >> >> >> > > > are expected results.
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > Evgueni
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > On 12/18/06, Vladimir Ivanov <ivavladimir@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> > > > > The smoke tests of DRLVM failed
today on the
> WindowsXP.
> >> >> Could
> >> >> >> >> somebody
> >> >> >> >> > > > > reproduce/fix it?
> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > >  Thanks, Vladimir
> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> C:\cc.harmony\trunk\cc\projects\drlvm\trunk\build\make\excludes\exclude.drlvm_smoke.windows.x86.jit
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > > > > <snip>
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> >> >> >> perf.CreateManyExceptions_depth
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result:
-1073741819
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> perf.MultiThreadsSimple
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: perf.SeveralThreads
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: perf.StressCornerSize
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> perf.StressCornerSize_a
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: perf.ThrowMany
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> >> perf.ThrowManyExceptions
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> >> >> >> perf.ThrowManyExceptions_depth
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: perf.ThrowMany_depth
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: reflect.GetMethod
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result:
1
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> shutdown.TestFatalError
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [java] Java Result:
130
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
:
> shutdown.TestInterrupt
> >> >> >> >> > > > >     [exec]      [echo]  PASSED
: shutdown.TestLock
> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> >> >> > > >
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> > --
> >> >> >> >> > Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> > Elena
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Mikhail Fursov

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message