harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Loenko" <mloe...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vmi] Retrieving system properties
Date Thu, 14 Dec 2006 10:50:04 GMT
I mean revert as few as possible changes (ideally one single commit)
causing failure.

2006/12/14, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com>:
> What do you want to roll back?  Everything since that point in time?
>
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > +1 for rolling back the changes.
> >
> > We shoud aim 100% of up-time. If the build is working
> > we can do further work, test and commit the changes, etc
> >
> > Let's roll it back so that other people who work on
> > the project could continue
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail
> >
> > 2006/12/14, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> >> On 12/14/06, Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> >> >
> >> > 2006/12/14, Tim Ellison :
> >> > > Alexey Varlamov wrote:
> >> > > > Fixed svn as agreed, both classlib and drlvm impl.
> >> > >
> >> > > Given it a VMI modification I would like to have had a more
> >> coordinated
> >> > > change, so the IBM VME can be changed too.  We are also trying to
> >> get a
> >> > > snapshot out so this would be one I would defer until that is done.
> >> >
> >> > AFAIU the snapshot is pointless if taken from broken repository state.
> >> > All CC systems were FAILED for > 2 days, since the initial
> >> > modification which provoked this discussion. I presume it is important
> >> > enough to get back to PASSED status quickly.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I support Alexey's point here.
> >>
> >> Sorry for being annoying but can not really understand what is the
> >> problem
> >> here with restoring things as they were before CC went down. And after
> >> that we can work out an appropriate solution and coordinate a change
> >> without
> >> hurrying.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Stepan.
> >>
> >>  Besides my speculation
> >> > was that current agreement reflects IBM VME behavior too so it does
> >> > not require urgent update.
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > Geir has some further questions on the rationale for the change.
> >> Let's
> >> > > give it more than 24hrs for agreement before committing.
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > > Tim
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stepan Mishura
> >> Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >>
> >>
>

Mime
View raw message