harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stepan Mishura" <stepan.mish...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][security] Whether to update the signed.bcprov.jar?
Date Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:07:34 GMT
On 12/18/06, Stepan Mishura wrote:
>
> On 12/18/06, Leo Li wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Mark:
> >     OK, I have seen the comment.
> >     I will try to add some modification to the script.
>
>
> Hi Leo,
>
> Thanks for a new patch. Your patch looks OK for me - all just will need
>   to rename 'signed.bcprov.jar' to 'bcprov.jar' in
> depends/jars/bcprov-jdk15-134
> or
>   rerun  'ant fetch-depends' (I guess CC will fail because of that)
>
> I'll wait for Mark comments - curious about "unnecessary work for
> developers". Just to be sure that I don't miss something.
>
>

Done at r488522.

Thanks,
Stepan.

 Thanks,
> Stepan.
>
>  On 12/18/06, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 18 December 2006 at 13:43, "Alexey Varlamov" <
> > > alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Stepan,
> > > >
> > > > I thougth we agreed to drop "signed" prefix. See also comment in the
> >
> > > > depends.properties:
> > > > --------------------
> > > > # will the next person to update bcprov.jar please remove the
> > "signed."
> > > > # prefix from the bcprov.jar property
> > > > bcprov.dir=${depends.jars}/bcprov-jdk15-134
> > > > bcprov.jar=${bcprov.dir}/signed.bcprov.jar
> > > > --------------------
> > >
> > > Indeed.  The 'signed.' prefix was left when I removed the 'unsigning'
> > > step that we needed a while back.  I couldn't remove the prefix
> > without
> > > making unnecessary work for developers so I left it to be removed next
> > > time developers had to fetch a new version.
> > >
> > > -Mark.
> > >
> > > > 2006/12/18, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > > > > On 12/14/06, Leo Li wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi, all:
> > > > > >     When fixing the bug of Harmony-2678, I found Harmony fails
> > to
> > > get the
> > > > > > AlgorithmParameters for the algorithm "OAEP" because of the
> > > > > > signed.bcprov.jar used lacks a class called "
> > > > > > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.JDKAlgorithmParameters$OAEP ".
But
> > it
> > > exist
> > > > s
> > > > > > in the latest release version of Bouncy Castle and I replace
the
> >
> > > current
> > > > > > used jar with bcprov-jdk15-134.jar and everything is OK.
> > > > > >     So shall we update the signed.bcprov.jar?  If it is, I will
> > give
> > > a
> > > > > > patch to the renew the make/depends.properties.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Leo,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've applied your patch for upgrading version of Bounce Castle
> > > provider
> > > > > (from HARMONY-2678).
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Stepan.
> >
> > --
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message