harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Mikhail Markov" <mikhail.a.mar...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][jmx] MX4J sources in Harmony svn
Date Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:17:03 GMT
+1 - I think it's the right time to take MX4J snapshot and start working on
generification and improvements.

Regards,
Mikhail


On 12/15/06, Krivenko, Sergey <sergey.krivenko@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Nathan Beyer [mailto:nbeyer@gmail.com]
> >Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 4:06 AM
> >To: dev@harmony.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: [classlib][jmx] MX4J sources in Harmony svn
> >
> >There seems to be continued activity on MX4J. There's a recent bug fix
> >that we haven't picked up yet. Maybe we should update to that first.
> >
> >-Nathan
>
> I agree. They just released version 3.0.2 on December, 10. Can we pick
> it up and start from there?
>
> >
> >On 12/14/06, Krivenko, Sergey <sergey.krivenko@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As far as I remember there was an intention to put MX4J sources into
> >> "standard" Harmony svn repository (see:
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-harmony-dev/200609.mb
> >> ox/%3c85DDB095-D112-46AC-9803-E3B5A69A3758@pobox.com%3e). Also there
> are
> >> 11 open JIRAs against MX4J already (not counting moving it to Java
> 1.5)
> >> and I'd like to start working on them.
> >>
> >> Could anybody from the committers start doing a "gentle fork" and put
> >> sources to the standard svn? Should I open a new JIRA regarding this?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sergey Krivenko
> >>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message