harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Weldon Washburn" <weldon...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [drlvm] finalizer design questions
Date Thu, 28 Dec 2006 01:34:56 GMT
On 12/27/06, Pavel Afremov <pavel.n.afremov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh. I see. In your proposal threads quantity isn't changed. It's a
> difference. I see.
> So on  Intel Core 2 Quad, for example, VM will have 4 permanent high
> priority finalaser threads.  Is it correct?

Yes.  That is the proposal for this stage of Harmony JVM development.  I
suggest that this is good enough until we get an app like SPECjAppServer
fully running and can really stress finalizers.  Only then will we know what
the real finalizer performance issues are.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message