Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
> Salikh,
> Thanks for a constructive customer response. Makes me think in a new
> way. Below are answers to your specific issues.
>
>> This looks like a disaster:
> Do you mean the menu? Let's see...
>
>> DRLVM documentation is gone
> Ok, I'll bring back the component pages :)
>
>> SVN information is gone,
> No. look at the downloads page
That's the wrong place. it needs it's own link.
>
>> Some of the links are duplicated: "Getting started", "Get involved",
>> "Contributing" -- there isn't good way to understand their exact
> meaning
>> besides reading the linked pages.
> Yes, I don't like the names either, but I don't know which pages to
> leave out of the menu and how to rename the rest.
> - Getting Started is the new element here and I have a strong feeling we
> should make this link part of menu. This is about how to download and
> use or download and build and use.
> - Contributing is about policies. Perhaps, we should name it so -
> Policy.
> - Get Involved is a central place for all means of communication with
> the project and some inspirational stuff like Am I Eligible and Submit a
> Patch if you like. Should probably keep it in the menu as well. Any
> ideas on what to call it?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Nadya
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: news [mailto:news@sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Salikh Zakirov
>> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 8:11 PM
>> To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [doc][user experience] minor improvements to website
>> navigation and content
>>
>> Morozova, Nadezhda wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've experimented a bit with our website to improve browsing and make
>>> key pages or ideas stand out more.
>>>
>>> See http://people.apache.org/~nadinem/docs/
>> This looks like a disaster:
>> DRLVM documentation is gone,
>> SVN information is gone,
>>
>> Some of the links are duplicated: "Getting started", "Get involved",
>> "Contributing" -- there isn't good way to understand their exact
> meaning
>> besides reading the linked pages.
>>
>> I've noticed one good point though: "JIRA" replaced with "Submit an
> issue",
>> which is much more clear for someone who doesn't know what JIRA is.
|