harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Konovalova, Svetlana" <svetlana.konoval...@intel.com>
Subject RE: [doc] are KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items valid?
Date Sun, 03 Dec 2006 15:02:51 GMT

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:geir@pobox.com] 
>Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 5:35 PM
>To: dev@harmony.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [doc] are KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items valid?
>
>Might I suggest that instead of asking for everyone to comment for 
>positive, please comment only for negative with the idea that we can 
>then discuss and then leave there (w/o comment) or remove.

OK, I don't mind.

>
>
>I just thing that it will result in a big list of "+1" that don't seem 
>to add much but visual clutter.
>
>
>I've reviewed the TODO, and each has my virtual +1 :)
Great! Thanks! 
>
>geir
>

Best regards,
Sveta
>>
>>Konovalova, Svetlana wrote:
>> Folks,
>>I found out that certain KNOWN ISSUES and TODO items mentioned in the
earlier version of the README file are posted nowhere, though they might
be relevant. 
>> I've collected them and have added to the following wiki pages:
>>[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/KnownNonBugIssuesAndLimitations
(Known Issues)
>> [2] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/TODO_Items
(TODO)
>>
>> Would be great, if you could find a chance to review the issues to
determine their validity.
>> 
>> IMHO if there is significant info, it should be replaced, let's say,
to the README. 
>> 
>> Thanks in advance!
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Sveta
>>  
>>  

Mime
View raw message