harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <g...@pobox.com>
Subject Re: [build-test] thoughts on other formats
Date Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:59:18 GMT

On Dec 28, 2006, at 12:54 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> I've been thinking a little bit about our alert messages, and
>
> 1) I think that each system that's submitting should have an  
> assigned ID, so it's easy to figure out who is what.  It can be as  
> easy as self-assignment on the wiki registration page.  Just take  
> the next integer.  I put these up on the system list on the wiki.
>
> 2) I'd like to have a "sequence number" for each message, and then  
> a reference sequence number for "BUILD FIXED" messages, to make it  
> easier to figure out which break was fixed (for CC systems that are  
> running multiple things).  This may be a pita, though, as it's  
> stateful.  But it's already stateful, I guess.
>
> 3) How about basic machine-readable formatting?  Maybe something  
> like the message body be a combination of a meta data header and  
> then the current blob of stuff we currently have.
>
> So :
>
> <info>
> 	<systemid>1</systemid>
> 	<status>FIXED</status>
> 	<sequence>102031</sequence>
> 	<reference>102030</sequence>

actually, we should put everything in there - platform, OS, tool  
info, etc....

> </info>
>
> =====
>
> .... Blob of stuff .....
>


Mime
View raw message