harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Alexei Zakharov" <alexei.zakha...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] indicators of unresolved Harmony bugs
Date Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:17:17 GMT
Does it make use of "patch_available"? It seems to be a very important
field for committers :)

Regards,

2006/12/6, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <aleksei.v.ivaschenko@intel.com>:
> Thanks!
> It's a good idea to classify classlib bugs by module names.
> I'll do that in next update.
>
> Tony Wu wrote:
> >Good job!
> >So many unresloved bugs. Seems there is a long way to go.
> >I have a suggestion but not the requirement. What about classify the
> >classlib related issuses by module name, accoding to the JIRA title.
> >You know, the title follows the format [classlib][modulename]Content.
> >
> >On 12/6/06, Ivaschenko, Aleksei V <aleksei.v.ivaschenko@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I've updated scripts for generating indicators of unresolved Harmony
> >> bugs:
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-2359
> >>
> >> Now scripts can generate separate indicators for "Classlib", "DRLVM",
> >> "VM" and "Contributions" Harmony components showing the proportions
> of
> >> their unresolved bugs by priority. Find the examples of indicators on
> >> wiki page:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Unresolved_Bugs_History



-- 
Alexei Zakharov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Mime
View raw message