harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [classlib][security] Whether to update the signed.bcprov.jar?
Date Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:07:42 GMT

On 18 December 2006 at 13:43, "Alexey Varlamov" <alexey.v.varlamov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stepan,
> 
> I thougth we agreed to drop "signed" prefix. See also comment in the
> depends.properties:
> --------------------
> # will the next person to update bcprov.jar please remove the "signed."
> # prefix from the bcprov.jar property
> bcprov.dir=${depends.jars}/bcprov-jdk15-134
> bcprov.jar=${bcprov.dir}/signed.bcprov.jar
> --------------------

Indeed.  The 'signed.' prefix was left when I removed the 'unsigning'
step that we needed a while back.  I couldn't remove the prefix without
making unnecessary work for developers so I left it to be removed next
time developers had to fetch a new version.

-Mark.

> 2006/12/18, Stepan Mishura <stepan.mishura@gmail.com>:
> > On 12/14/06, Leo Li wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, all:
> > >     When fixing the bug of Harmony-2678, I found Harmony fails to get the
> > > AlgorithmParameters for the algorithm "OAEP" because of the
> > > signed.bcprov.jar used lacks a class called "
> > > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.JDKAlgorithmParameters$OAEP ". But it exist
> s
> > > in the latest release version of Bouncy Castle and I replace the current
> > > used jar with bcprov-jdk15-134.jar and everything is OK.
> > >     So shall we update the signed.bcprov.jar?  If it is, I will give a
> > > patch to the renew the make/depends.properties.
> >
> >
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > I've applied your patch for upgrading version of Bounce Castle provider
> > (from HARMONY-2678).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Stepan.
> >
> > --
> > > Leo Li
> > > China Software Development Lab, IBM
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stepan Mishura
> > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division
> >
> >
> 



Mime
View raw message