harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ivan Volosyuk" <ivan.volos...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DRLVM][GCv5] patch for new LOS collector and finalizer/weakref support
Date Mon, 11 Dec 2006 15:44:39 GMT
I'm not against work balancing system. I just have an opinion that the
threads used for finalization should run with higher priority. I don't
have strict motivation for this, just think that it will make us alike
the RI.
--
Ivan

On 12/11/06, Pavel Afremov <pavel.n.afremov@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did You mean high priority forever? Or tuned priority of finalizer thread?
>
> You wrote threads. How many threads You'd like to have?
>
>
>
> Pavel.
>
>
> On 12/11/06, Ivan Volosyuk <ivan.volosyuk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/11/06, Pavel Afremov <pavel.n.afremov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 3.       In Finalization system now there is Work Balance Mechanism
> > which
> > > tunes performance of finalization. When many finalizable object are
> > > allocated and queue for finalization isn't empty this mechanism increase
> > > performance of finalization (more detailed description see in dev
> > guide). I
> > > can't found usage of Work Balance Subsystem in this patch. Maybe it
> > would be
> > > better to use WBS instead high priority forever for finalizer thread.
> >
> > IMHO, I would prefer to have high priority finalizer threads.
> > --
> > Ivan
> >
>
>


-- 
Ivan
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

Mime
View raw message