Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of gcjhd-harmony-dev@m.gmane.org
 designates 80.91.229.2 as permitted sender)
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
From: Alex Astapchuk <alex.astapchuk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [drlvm][x86_64] DRLVM broken after HARMONY-2223
Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:48:31 +0600
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <ek9011$n7q$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <ek1vo5$dmj$1@sea.gmane.org> <456485C1.2040201@pobox.com>
 <ek3e56$hpd$1@sea.gmane.org> <45671AB5.7030704@pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
In-Reply-To: <45671AB5.7030704@pobox.com>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> 
> 
> Alex Astapchuk wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
>>> I have a small problem with this - seems like we're rushing patches 
>>> in without much review or discussion.   For a while there we were 
>>> able to test on a few platforms first, lazily, because there was more 
>>> than 1 hour between patch submission and commit.
>>
>> Actually, the patch was there for a week - since Nov.17.
> 
> Really? When I took a look at the comment and patch log, things were 
> going fast and furious on 23 Nov, including a patch at 5:35am.

It's still all the same patch since the Nov. 17. It was onyl attached
several times to the same JIRA.
In the final version I only added few comment words.


>>
>> Thought, it's still my fault that I did not check the em64t build :-(
>> Sorry about that, I'm in working on the fix right now.
> 
> It's ok - things will break.  I was just want to make sure activities 
> like this remain visible on the dev list.
> 
> geir
> 
>>
> 


-- 
Thanks,
   Alex