Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of pmcfirst@gmail.com designates
 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
        b=i544BBH5LeDlP4BzFvF7ENFSVjG3ZDye5qXME3CUIjBGYvzxCDwwFtA4gusH//b7+awNNuw+yUhVFKgq5arv/iOhWLEgMs4v7MThSeNs7Www3iaL1icb0fuIagtjs1X499EV3JYsZ14AH3tGcbLuCX1R6EGfvhqjN9rdMqNX85c=
Message-ID: <e0f125db0611111350l17f2a98fu92bde823b3b8d0c3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 00:50:50 +0300
From: "Pavel Pervov" <pmcfirst@gmail.com>
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org, geir@pobox.com
Subject: Re: svn commit: r473588 - in
 /incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm: interpreter/src/
 port/src/lil/em64t/pim/ vmcore/include/ vmcore/src/util/em64t/base/
In-Reply-To: <455643BA.5020508@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_Part_6181_11187105.1163281850243"
References: <20061111001752.2AADC1A9846@eris.apache.org>
	 <4555274B.5020009@apache.org>
	 <200611111321.44051.gshimansky@gmail.com> <455643BA.5020508@pobox.com>

------=_Part_6181_11187105.1163281850243
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Geir,

Does SVN support some sort of exclude lists?


On 11/12/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <geir@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Gregory Shimansky wrote:
> > On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:28 Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >> gshimansky@apache.org wrote:
> >>> Author: gshimansky
> >>> Date: Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006
> >>> New Revision: 473588
> >>>
> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473588
> >>> Log:
> >>> Applied HARMONY-2152 [drlvm][em64t] build is broken after 1558 have
> been
> >>> committed
> >>>
> >>> Since x86_64 is not yet fully supported and patch touched only x86_64
> >>> files no tests were ran. When I tried acceptance tests on em64t server
> I
> >>> effectively shut it down.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Modified:
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h URL:
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vm
> >>>
> core/include/version_svn_tag.h?view=diff&rev=473588&r1=473587&r2=473588
> >>>
> =========================================================================
> >>> ===== ---
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h (original) +++
> >>>
> incubator/harmony/enhanced/drlvm/trunk/vm/vmcore/include/version_svn_tag.
> >>> h Fri Nov 10 16:17:50 2006 @@ -18,6 +18,6 @@
> >>>  #ifndef _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
> >>>  #define _VERSION_SVN_TAG_
> >>>
> >>> -#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "473506"
> >>> +#define VERSION_SVN_TAG  "svn: This client is too old to work with
> >>> working copy '.'; please get a newer Subversion client"
> >> uh?
> >
> > Ok it seems like svn version on the x86_64 server was too old for the
> checked
> > out repository. Don't worry, the version file will be fixed with a next
> > commit to VM.
> >
> > It looks like we should really autogenerate it and remove it from svn as
> was
> > suggested in another thread.
> >
>
> It is autogenerated.  We just need to stop committing it...
>
> geir
>
>


-- 
Pavel Pervov,
Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division

------=_Part_6181_11187105.1163281850243--