Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4438 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2006 11:46:10 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2006 11:46:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 25574 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 11:46:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 25539 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 11:46:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 25530 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2006 11:46:15 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:46:15 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of alexey.a.petrenko@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.173 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.173] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:46:04 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so1119236uge for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:45:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iiVnEW3nyxhk3HWoeLDh1Xivzq1RE3aE25c3Wz2cF5Gar/wp+xbop03I6vkYAid7nzezue4HJfqZ3l7rMLKlC07A2Y5n485ADL1LsER/Y+BrI0YYyQBy1nUHqMrpsdxH4zvwNYHxNLFl0uHi4bG432IGe2ixCjMdy1K6dDT1bnY= Received: by 10.78.142.14 with SMTP id p14mr831897hud.1164714342690; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.107.10 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:45:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:45:42 +0300 From: "Alexey Petrenko" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [performance] a few early benchmarks In-Reply-To: <456B2034.4090904@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <455D47F9.60606@apache.org> <906dd82e0611230250q6b6a8753wfef83958f36ec631@mail.gmail.com> <45675DA9.7010508@apache.org> <906dd82e0611262124m1240ddc8s53dfaa997af21102@mail.gmail.com> <456A869B.6000306@apache.org> <906dd82e0611262236t4e8e8965uf35a18096f7ed08b@mail.gmail.com> <456B2034.4090904@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org 2006/11/27, Stefano Mazzocchi : > And, finally, I don't care if Spec it's the industry standard: I believe that good results in SPEC, which is industry standard as you said, will give us more users from the industry where SPEC is a standard. And this is good for Harmony: more users, more testers, more contributors. And I agree with Mikhail nobody asks EVERY Harmony contributor to test ALL the fixes on ALL platforms and run EVERY benchmark before each patch. Other community members will help! SY, Alexey