Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4668 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2006 14:55:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Nov 2006 14:55:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 64952 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2006 14:54:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-harmony-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64915 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2006 14:54:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact harmony-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64806 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2006 14:54:44 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:54:43 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of mike.fursov@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.224 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.224] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.224) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:54:27 -0800 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s13so140729wxc for ; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:54:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=QbFe7YugZtZjBlW6gxKufxAwi83yjT3PF0lyD/KW8M0guBSlmzmCRoCjrPNwEdO5tWKPxOpp/ZerCLAVTk7c7RZAE5ruRhT+LeVMw345KywvrsN66aHucwlyEtw57i4A5SuYUOsFlKxlS0kvdAe2ICMtJzmYb8VanlGiI4CVI7E= Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr767905huf.1162479245317; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:54:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.182.4 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:54:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:54:05 +0600 From: "Mikhail Fursov" To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib] Preprocessor - CHECKPOINT In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3164_13276881.1162479245180" References: <8E389A5F2FEABA4CB1DEC35A25CB39CE694EF8@mssmsx411> <45470FA5.2000801@gmail.com> <45473BA9.1070709@gmail.com> <45474144.5060108@pobox.com> <4547431C.5080000@pobox.com> <4549FAE2.4030606@pobox.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3164_13276881.1162479245180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/2/06, Sian January wrote: > > Just thinking about J2ME, I can imagine that some source files are going > to be very different. For example there are no Java 5 features in J2ME, > so > any generic classes will have to be almost completely different. My > concern > is that trying to combine two quite different classes in the same file is > going be very difficult to read and understand. > Good point! I think Java1.2 classes format is a reason to move J2ME development into separate branch. The only usecase for preprocessor is left (correct me if I miss something) is Java6 changes. ? -- Mikhail Fursov ------=_Part_3164_13276881.1162479245180--