Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72887 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2006 09:56:38 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2006 09:56:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 49671 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 09:56:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 49633 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 09:56:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 49612 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2006 09:56:41 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:56:40 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ivavladimir@gmail.com designates 66.249.92.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.92.175] (HELO ug-out-1314.google.com) (66.249.92.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:56:25 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z36so1100035uge for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:55:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Gn6jHxebFupopQuB3+Afsz5lCXy5Qn2Zi17mY2PHCM6/GBi+qSEREaXM3GzW7KK1XhTv7PwcIIwzHcLBX98Rn618QJ2Jg0W5JtanSaZCeX5PdNZv+Jcs152vkDzHpnmcLKbXzVT9DMbN6/U1a/hOJ5OaBA2gLrTjTz22J3ofxA8= Received: by 10.78.204.7 with SMTP id b7mr778591hug.1164707756984; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.202.17 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:55:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7273946b0611280155l688bb348l5ada0c04c181a42a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:55:56 +0600 From: "Vladimir Ivanov" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [build-test] Should we setup a separate mail list for "alerts"? In-Reply-To: <456C04A0.2090907@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_3924_16487472.1164707756928" References: <456BB62B.3020609@pobox.com> <456C04A0.2090907@gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_3924_16487472.1164707756928 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Could we just exclude test while it is under investigation? In this case we will see only one notification for each failure. Thanks, Valdimir On 11/28/06, Tim Ellison wrote: > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > Each of us can use filters to sort them, but it seems like it wouldn't > > be a bad idea having a separate list for this kind of thing. comments? > > I'm happy enough for them to be on the commit list, but as you wrote > elsewhere we need to stop getting repeated messages for the same failed > state (these are being worked on). > > Regards, > Tim > > -- > > Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com) > IBM Java technology centre, UK. > ------=_Part_3924_16487472.1164707756928--