Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44308 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2006 03:03:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 1 Dec 2006 03:03:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 72597 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2006 03:03:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 72569 invoked by uid 500); 1 Dec 2006 03:03:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 72560 invoked by uid 99); 1 Dec 2006 03:03:08 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:03:08 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of zhanghuangzhu@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.191] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:02:57 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a4so3518586nfc for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:02:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=a//2NrKSAGKfM57/pmR4kFDjKb0njfULXJW/YUKBtrssjCVuulRprQ29fJh/BnePMv6TyVtQc953OXLsQMly5l5OvPbrUuUUhpRNKN6Swu7DkCv7RVw8yPKCdEM5/re+7qIgw5RnBwNfaRKCZ9AM0gNHhQnC8IoX8OHV5J0NIEM= Received: by 10.82.179.9 with SMTP id b9mr967358buf.1164942155651; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:02:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.113.12 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:02:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4d0b24970611301902l2b4b3c18x73997c6127a1cb0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:02:35 +0800 From: "Andrew Zhang" To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib][nio] DatagramChannelTest failure In-Reply-To: <2c9597b90611300812r57a4c1c9pb29a70edfd397260@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_51979_27309484.1164942155614" References: <2c9597b90611300812r57a4c1c9pb29a70edfd397260@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_51979_27309484.1164942155614 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Alexei, What's your platform? The test passes on my machine (Windows XP, SP2) with latest code. Thanks! On 12/1/06, Alexei Zakharov wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today 9 tests from the above test class fail on my machine with the > following message: > > --- > (10040) A message sent on a datagram socket was larger than the > internal message buffer or some other network limit, or the buffer > used to receive a datagram into was smaller than the datagram itself. > > java.net.SocketException: (10040) A message sent on a datagram socket > was larger than the internal message buffer or some other network > limit, or the buffer used to receive a datagram into was smaller than > the datagram itself. at > org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSNetworkSystem.sendDatagramImpl(Native > Method) at org.apache.harmony.luni.platform.OSNetworkSystem.sendDatagram( > OSNetworkSystem.java:142) > at org.apache.harmony.nio.internal.DatagramChannelImpl.send( > DatagramChannelImpl.java:348) > at > org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.DatagramChannelTest.testSend_NoServerTwice > (DatagramChannelTest.java:1155) > at java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.invokeV(AccessibleObject.java:25) > --- > > However, yesterday it works fine. Does anyone have ideas why it starts to > fail? > -- > Alexei Zakharov, > Intel Enterprise Solutions Software Division > -- Best regards, Andrew Zhang ------=_Part_51979_27309484.1164942155614--