Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37517 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2006 13:03:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2006 13:03:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 49557 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 13:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 49526 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2006 13:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 49517 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2006 13:03:32 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:03:32 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.4 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: 216.86.168.178 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of geir@pobox.com) Received: from [216.86.168.178] (HELO mxout-03.mxes.net) (216.86.168.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:03:19 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.104] (unknown [67.86.14.213]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810FC51930 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:02:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <456C3397.4060109@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:03:19 -0500 From: "Geir Magnusson Jr." Reply-To: geir@pobox.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [build-test] Should we setup a separate mail list for "alerts"? References: <456BB62B.3020609@pobox.com> <456C04A0.2090907@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <456C04A0.2090907@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Tim Ellison wrote: > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >> Each of us can use filters to sort them, but it seems like it wouldn't >> be a bad idea having a separate list for this kind of thing. comments? > > I'm happy enough for them to be on the commit list, but as you wrote > elsewhere we need to stop getting repeated messages for the same failed > state (these are being worked on). Would you be against having another list? We can all filter easy enough - the motivation was really for archiving purposes.... geir